Before heading out to Montana de Oro I had some
idea of the terrain we would be working in, but not a complete picture. From
what I understood, the trees had been uniformly planted decades ago, with the
intention of cutting them down to use for railroad ties. I believed that the area was going to be flat
and easy to traverse, it just seemed like it would be logical to plant the
trees somewhere that would be easy to harvest them.
![]() |
The evenly spaced trees |
We had planned to do transect sampling to
get a population estimate, but three samples in and our stamina started to give
out. After two more samples we decided that we needed to try another method. We
weren’t getting the kind of accuracy we needed out of our transect
measurements. Our GPS wasn’t accurate enough to keep us on track for the entire
length of a transect and the difficult terrain meant we had to wander off track
occasionally.
Jefferson and I decided to break off from the transect group
and give spot counting a try. We chose a random set of GPS coordinates in the
area and measured out a circle with a 15 meter radius. From there we counted
every tree inside the circle. We did this twice and compared our data to the
transect counted trees.
The area of the transects was roughly 715m2
while the circles measured 707m2.
The transect counted trees averaged between 36-49 per plotted area, the
spot counted trees were counted as 49 and 41. The methods provide similar data,
but the spot counting was substantially easier to do. In the future we will go
out to Montana de Oro again and do a
more intensive series of spot counting.
No comments:
Post a Comment